Legal Opinion

State v. Kuhlmann

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 21, 2011No. A09-0915PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

This case presents the issue of whether a defendant whose counsel stipulates to the defendant having previous convictions that are an element of the charged offense must also personally waive his or her right to a jury trial on the stipulated element. Appellant Brent Theodore Kuhlmann was convicted after a jury trial of one count of domestic assault, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.2242, subd. 4 (2010), and one count of test refusal, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 169A.25, subd. 1(b) (2010). On appeal, Kuhlmann argues that the trial court committed reversible error when it…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State of Minnesota v. Clarence Bruce BeaulieuSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Darryl Colbert v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  4. State v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  5. State v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API