Legal Opinion

Steffey v. Municipality of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 2000No. S-8929PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Robert Steffey suffered two work-related injuries in 1992 and received chiropractic care regularly until 1995, at which point his employer controverted his claims. Steffey filed numerous reports of injury complaining that work had aggravated his condition. Because the employer presented substantial evidence that work did not aggravate Steffey's symptoms, we affirm the Board's decision denying Steffey benefits.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

The Municipality of Anchorage has employed Robert Steffey as a Refuse Disposal Utility III worker since 1988. The job…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. DeYonge v. Nana/MarriottAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Burgess Construction Co. v. SmallwoodAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Veco, Inc. v. WolferAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Interior Paint Company v. RodgersAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Fairbanks N. Star Bor. v. Rogers & BablerAlaska Supreme Court · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Humphrey v. Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Huit v. Ashwater Burns, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Cowen v. Wal-MartAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Budig v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  5. McGAHUEY v. WHITESTONE LOGGING, INC.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API