Steffey v. Municipality of Anchorage
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Robert Steffey suffered two work-related injuries in 1992 and received chiropractic care regularly until 1995, at which point his employer controverted his claims. Steffey filed numerous reports of injury complaining that work had aggravated his condition. Because the employer presented substantial evidence that work did not aggravate Steffey's symptoms, we affirm the Board's decision denying Steffey benefits.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
The Municipality of Anchorage has employed Robert Steffey as a Refuse Disposal Utility III worker since 1988. The job…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- DeYonge v. Nana/MarriottAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Burgess Construction Co. v. SmallwoodAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Veco, Inc. v. WolferAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Interior Paint Company v. RodgersAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Fairbanks N. Star Bor. v. Rogers & BablerAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Humphrey v. Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Huit v. Ashwater Burns, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Cowen v. Wal-MartAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Budig v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- McGAHUEY v. WHITESTONE LOGGING, INC.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.