Legal Opinion

Cowen v. Wal-Mart

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 2004No. S-10836PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Jackie Cowen, claiming that her employment caused her left breast saline implant to deflate, sought workers’ compensation benefits from her employer, Wal-Mart. The Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board rejected her claim. We affirm the superior court’s affirmance of the board’s decision because we conclude that the opinions of two physicians were substantial evidence permitting the board to conclude that Cowen’s work activities did not cause her implant to deflate.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

At the time of her injury, Jackie Cowen was employed as a Direct to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. DeYonge v. Nana/MarriottAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Grove v. Alaska Construction & ErectorsAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Childs v. Copper Valley Electric Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Yahara v. Construction & Rigging, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Big K Grocery v. GibsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Thoeni v. Consumer Electronic ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Humphrey v. Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Leigh v. Seekins FordAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Huit v. Ashwater Burns, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Smith v. University of Alaska, FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API