Budig v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VOIGT, Chief Justice.
[T1] In this appeal, Seott Raymond Bu-dig (the appellant) challenges his conviction for third-degree sexual assault and second-degree sexual abuse of a minor. The appellant asserts that his constitutionally protected right to confrontation was violated and that the prosecutor improperly vouched for the credibility of the victim witnesses. Finding no error, we will affirm.
ISSUES
[12] 1. Whether the district court abridged the appellant's right to confrontation when it limited the seope of his cross-examination of the victims?
2. Whether the prosecutor unfairly vouched for…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Olden v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Stephens v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Scadden v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Travis Bogard v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Woods v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- Michael Scott Carroll, II v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Michael Allan LindstromWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Jason Bradley McGill v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.