Legal Opinion

Budig v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 2010No. S-09-0038PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Chief Justice.

[T1] In this appeal, Seott Raymond Bu-dig (the appellant) challenges his conviction for third-degree sexual assault and second-degree sexual abuse of a minor. The appellant asserts that his constitutionally protected right to confrontation was violated and that the prosecutor improperly vouched for the credibility of the victim witnesses. Finding no error, we will affirm.

ISSUES

[12] 1. Whether the district court abridged the appellant's right to confrontation when it limited the seope of his cross-examination of the victims?

2. Whether the prosecutor unfairly vouched for…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Olden v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Stephens v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Scadden v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Travis Bogard v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Woods v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Michael Scott Carroll, II v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Michael Allan LindstromWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Jason Bradley McGill v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API