DeYonge v. Nana/Marriott
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case presents the question of whether a worker who suffers increased symptoms due to the physical requirements of her job is entitled to workers' compensation. Judy DeYonge, who had a preexisting arthritic condition, claims that working as a housekeeper for NANA/Marriott aggravated her condition to the point where she could no longer perform her job. The Workers' Compensation Board denied her claim for benefits and compensation because it concluded that, although her symptoms may have worsened as a result of her job, her underlying condition did not.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miller v. ITT Arctic ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Thornton v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- Burgess Construction Co. v. SmallwoodAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Veco, Inc. v. WolferAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- William David Hensley v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. DeShongAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Adamson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Dougan v. Aurora Electric Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Smith v. CSK Auto, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Lopez v. Administrator, Public Employees' Retirement SystemAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.