Legal Opinion
Burgess Construction Co. v. Smallwood
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided February 6, 1981No. 4502PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONNOR, Justice.
This worker’s compensation case is before this court for the second time, after an extensive history of proceedings. Treating the present appeal as a petition for review, see City and Borough of Juneau v. Thibodeau, 595 P.2d 626, 628-29 (Alaska 1979), we hereby grant review. 1
William S. Smallwood first filed a claim for worker’s compensation in October of 1973, alleging that his employment as a truckdriver with Burgess Construction Company contributed to the acute renal failure he suffered in 1970, necessitating the surgical removal of both kidneys. At the first hearing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City & Borough of Juneau v. ThibodeauAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Miller v. ITT Arctic ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Thornton v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- Interior Paint Company v. RodgersAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Fireman's Fund American Insurance Companies v. GomesAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- DeYonge v. Nana/MarriottAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Veco, Inc. v. WolferAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Adamson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Delaney v. Alaska AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Fairbanks N. Star Bor. v. Rogers & BablerAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.