Legal Opinion

Miller & Lux Incorporated v. Nickel

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 15, 1957No. 34043PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLIVER J. CARTER, District Judge.

The plaintiff corporation has brought this action against fifty-five defendants, several of whom were formerly officers and agents of plaintiff. The complaint alleges that while these officers and agents were in control of the plaintiff, they conspired to deprive it of many of its large land holdings, pursuant to which the land was conveyed to themselves and others on their behalf; that, much of the land has subsequently been conveyed to many of the other defendants named, all of whom are alleged to have taken with notice of the plaintiff’s equities.

The…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Massie v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. Casey v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Kelleam v. Maryland Casualty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Greeley v. LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Anderson v. BensonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1953

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Raphael J. Musicus, Inc. v. Safeway Stores, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  2. De George v. Mandata Poultry CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. A. Alex Shuford, Jr. v. Roy G. Anderson, and Currier & Carlsen, Incorporated, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  4. Big Robin Farms v. California Spray-Chemical Corp.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1958
  5. Prawoto v. PrimeLendingDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API