Legal Opinion
De George v. Mandata Poultry Company
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 24, 1961No. Civ. A. 28838PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, District Judge.
The defendants have moved to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint on the grounds 1) that the defendant Zimmerman was not validly served with process, and the Court therefore has not obtained personal jurisdiction over him; and 2) that venue was improperly laid in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The plaintiff has moved the Court to transfer this action to the Middle District of Pennsylvania instead of dismissing it, contending that the service of process upon the defendants was valid, but admitting that venue in the Eastern District was improperly laid.
I. Re Validity of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Olberding v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Davis v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Jacobson v. Indianapolis Power & Light CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1958
- Minter v. Fowler & Williams, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- Miller & Lux Incorporated v. NickelDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Jerry Wayne Davis v. Hill Engineering, Inc. And Williams-Mcwilliams Co., Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Burbank International, Ltd. v. Gulf Consolidated International Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1977
- Hawkins v. National Basketball AssociationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Baksay v. Rensellear Polytech InstituteDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Day v. United Securities CorporationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.