Legal Opinion

Kelleam v. Maryland Casualty Co. of Baltimore

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 17, 1941No. 349PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

This controversy has its origin in a probate proceeding in an Oklahoma court. Petitioner, E. A. Kelleam, was administrator in that proceeding. Respondent, Maryland Casualty Company, was surety on his bond. The probate court held that all of decedent’s property was a maternal ancestral estate to which the full-blood heirs, E. A. Kelleam and Nell Southard, were entitled to the exclusion of the half-blood heirs, the individual respondents here. Such distribution was ordered and the administrator and Maryland Casualty Company were discharged from further liability. No appeal was taken; but…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Penn Central Casualty Co. v. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. SchnaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Pennsylvania v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanssenSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Booth v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1855

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Siloam Springs Hotel, L.L.C. v. Century Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  3. C. L. Whitelock v. Delbert LeathermanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  4. Lesnik v. Public Industrials CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  5. Jau-Fei Chen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2004

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API