Legal Opinion

Casey v. Adams

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 19, 1880No. 248PublishedCited by 132 opinions

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana. This was a proceeding instituted in the Fifteenth Judicial District Court, parish of La Fourche, Louisiana, by Adams & Co.,'against sundry parties, among whom was Nicholas W. Casey, receiver of the New Orleans Banking Association, which was organized under the act of Congress and established at New Orleans.

Read the full summary

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana. This was a proceeding instituted in the Fifteenth Judicial District Court, parish of La Fourche, Louisiana, by Adams & Co.,'against sundry parties, among whom was Nicholas W. Casey, receiver of the New Orleans Banking Association, which was organized under the act of Congress and established at New Orleans. It appears that, by virtue of executory process issued out of that court,, a certain parcel.of land in the parish, whereon Adams & Co. held a mortgage, was sold, ’they becoming the purchasers for less than their debt. “ The sheriff…

1Opinion of the Court

Me'. Chibe Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court..The-Federal question in this case is whether a national bank can be sued in a State court in a local action in any other county or city than than where the bank is located. By sect. 5198, B,ev. Stat., it is -provided that “suits, actions,' and proceedings-'against any association under this title [The National Banks] may be had in any circuit, district, or territorial court of the United. States held within the district in which such association may be established, or in any State, county, or municipal court .in the coiinty or city…

2Cited by132 opinions

  1. Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Michigan National Bank v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Citizens & Southern National Bank v. BougasSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Woolf v. McGaughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. In Re School Asbestos Litigation. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. v. The Honorable James McGirr Kelly, Nominal and Barnwell School District No. 45, in Re School Asbestos Litigation. United States Gypsum Company v. The Honorable James McGirr Kelly, Nominal and Barnwell School District No. 45, School District of Lancaster, Manheim Township School District, Lampeter-Strasburg School District, Board of Education of the Memphis City Schools, and a Conditionally Certified Class, in Re School Asbestos Litigation. Fibreboard Corporation v. The Honorable James McGirr Kelly, Nominal and Barnwell School District No. 45, School District of Lancaster, Manheim Township School District, Lampeter-Strasburg School District, Board of Education of the Memphis City Schools, and a Conditionally Certified Class, in Re School Asbestos Litigation. W.R. Grace & Co. v. The Honorable James McGirr Kelly, Nominal and Barnwell School District No. 45, School District of Lancaster, Manheim Township School District, Lampeter-Strasburg School District, Board of Education of the Memphis City Schools, and a Conditionally Certified ClassCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API