Legal Opinion
Alzuraiki v. Heinauer
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided February 13, 2008No. 4:07CV3189PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RICHARD G. KOPF, District Judge.
The plaintiff submitted a N-400 application for naturalization to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”). The plaintiff has not yet been interviewed because the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) name check is not complete, so he seeks to speed up the decision making. Jurisdiction is asserted under 28 U.S.C. § 1361 (Mandamus Act), 5 U.S.C. §§ 555 and 701 et seq. (Administrative Procedure Act or “APA”), and 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal question jurisdiction). 1 This action is before me upon a motion to dismiss for lack of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re Sdds, Inc., a South Dakota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Saini v. HeinauerDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2008
- Joshi v. GarlandDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2024