Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
Petitioner Rafeh-Rafie Ardestani prevailed in an administrative deportation proceeding brought by respondent Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS). She sought attorney’s fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 5 U. S. C. § 504 and 28 U. S. C. § 2412, which provides that prevailing parties in certain adversarial proceedings may recover attorney’s fees from the Government. We now consider whether the EAJA authorizes the award of attorney’s fees and costs for administrative deportation proceedings before the INS. We conclude that it does not.
I
Ardestani is an Iranian…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by610 opinions
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Leonard F. v. Israel Discount Bank of New York, and the Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Pereira v. SessionsSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Kucana v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
605 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.