Saini v. Heinauer
District Court, D. Nebraska
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARD G. KOPF, District Judge.
The plaintiff submitted a N^400 application for naturalization to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”). The plaintiff has not yet been interviewed because the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) name check is not complete, so she seeks to expedite the decision-making. Jurisdiction is asserted under 28 U.S.C. § 1361 (“Mandamus Act”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 555 & 701 et seq. (“Administrative Procedure Act” or “APA”), and 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal question jurisdiction). 1 This action is before me upon a motion (filing 12) to dismiss for lack…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re Sdds, Inc., a South Dakota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Endicott v. INS "Perez"District Court, D. Nebraska · 2019
- Hasan Mohammed Albalwah v. Joseph B. Edlow; Kristi Noem; Kashyap Patel; and Pamela BondiDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2025