Legal Opinion
Jamail v. Stoneledge Condominium Owners Ass'n
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided May 14, 1998No. 03-97-00734-CVPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POWERS, Justice.
Emile and Scott Jamail appeal from a summary-judgment order rendered in their suit against Stoneledge Condominium Owners Association. We will affirm the order in. part, reverse the order in part, and remand the cause to the trial court for proceedings not inconsistent with our opinion.
THE CONTROVERSY
Emile Jamail dedicated Stoneledge I and II subdivisions now within the municipal limits of the City of Austin. At all material times, the property was subject to Austin municipal ordinances. The dedicated property is shown on a drawing affixed to this opinion. The Jamails each own…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Barfield v. Howard M. Smith Company of AmarilloTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- Hill Farm, Inc. v. Hill CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. ComptonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- G., H. S.A. Ry. Co. v. DegroffTexas Supreme Court · 1909
- Stein v. Highland Park Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Simi Investment Company Inc v. Harris County TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Ebner v. First State Bank of Smithville, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
- Lethu Inc. v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2000
- YALAMANCHILI v. Mousa, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
- Lake Travis Independent School District v. Lovelace, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.