Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. Compton
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
J. CURTISS BROWN, Chief Justice.
This ease involves an automobile accident that occurred outside of the Hoechst Cela-nese chemical plant. Following a jury trial, the trial court entered a judgment favorable to Mark Gregory Compton (Compton), appel-lee. Hoechst Celanese Corporation (Cela-nese), appellant, brings ten point of error challenging the trial court’s judgment. We reverse and render.
Officers Kevin Lawrence and Dianne Cur-rie were off-duty police officers from the Seabrook Police Department. These officers, and others, were engaged by Celanese to direct traffic outside of the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- Redinger v. Living, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Stafford v. StaffordTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Robbins v. Chicago CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Newspapers, Inc. v. LoveTexas Supreme Court · 1964
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Fifth Club, Inc. v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Duran v. Furr's Supermarkets, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1996
- Loyd v. ECO Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
- Cherqui v. Westheimer Street Festival Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
- Bell v. VPSI, INC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.