Legal Opinion

Hill Farm, Inc. v. Hill County

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1969No. B-872PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Justice.

This suit was brought by Hill County, respondent, to obtain a mandatory injunction requiring Hill Farm, Inc., petitioner, to remove a pipeline placed by the latter in a public road. Summary judgment was rendered for the County, and the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed. 425 S.W.2d 414.

Petitioner extended a 2-inch galvanized pipeline from a well on land owned by G. E. Ryno to a tract owned by Guy Moore. It provides water for petitioner’s operations, for three families who live on petitioner’s property, and for three neighbors. The line is laid in the public road for a distance of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Cater v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  2. City of Austin v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. Colegrove Water Co. v. City of HollywoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Levi v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Guynes v. Galveston CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Southern Union Co. v. City of EdinburgTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Renfro v. ShropshireCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Harlingen Irrigation District Cameron County No. 1 v. Caprock Communications Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
  5. Graff v. Whittle, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1997

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API