Legal Opinion

Smith v. Eighth Judicial District Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1991No. 21939PublishedCited by 488 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This original petition for writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges an order of the respondent district court, Jeffrey D. Sobel, Judge, denying petitioners’ motion to strike a peremptory challenge directed against the same judge as successor to litigation presided over by Judge Sobel’s predecessor in office.

Facts

This proceeding is part of a continuing conflict between petitioners and the real parties in interest. The original complaint filed in 1984 pleaded allegations of breach of contract and fraud. A ten-day trial resulted in a $4,516,565.22 judgment against petitioners and in…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Department of Transportation v. ThompsonNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Hickey v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State Ex Rel. Moore v. Fourth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Bowler v. First Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Nevada Pay TV v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by488 opinions

  1. International Game Technology, Inc. v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Miller v. BurkNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Cote v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Club Vista Financial Services, L.L.C. v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2012

483 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API