Legal Opinion

Strickland v. Waymire

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 2010No. 55290, 55551PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Pickering, J.:

These consolidated appeals require us to interpret Article 2, Section 9 of the Nevada Constitution, which subjects every public officer in Nevada to recall by special election upon the filing of a qualifying recall petition signed by “not less than twenty-five percent (25%) of the number” of registered voters “who actually voted in the state or in the county, district, or municipality [that the officer] represents, at the election in which [the officer] was elected.” Nev. Const, art. 2, § 9.

The question presented is whose signature counts toward the 25…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United States v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Miller v. BurkNevada Supreme Court · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Landreth v. MalikNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  2. City of Sparks v. Sparks Municipal CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Pohlabel v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  4. MDC Rests., LLC v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.Nevada Supreme Court · 2018
  5. DOE DANCER I VS. LA FUENTE, INC.Nevada Supreme Court · 2021

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API