Legal Opinion

Jeremias v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 2018No. 67228PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, STIGLICH, J.:

This opinion addresses matters which arose during appellant Ralph Jeremias' trial for the murders of Brian Hudson and Paul Stephens. We focus the bulk of our discussion on Jeremias' claim that the district court violated his right to a public trial by closing the courtroom to members of the public during jury selection without making sufficient findings to warrant the closure. Under Presley v. Georgia, 558 U.S. 209, 130 S.Ct. 721, 175 L.Ed.2d 675 (2010), such a violation constitutes structural error, which usually entitles an appellant to automatic reversal of his…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Cary Williams v. Timothy FilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. State v. LotterNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Castillo v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2019
  4. in Interest of M.BColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. State v. LotterNebraska Supreme Court · 2018

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API