Legal Opinion

Bank of Westfield v. Inman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1892No. 16,652PublishedCited by 22 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, C. J.

This case is before us on a motion made' by the appellees to dismiss the appeal, on account of the failure of the appellant to have a notice of the appeal served upon one whose name, as an appellee, appears in the assignment of errors, and who was a necessary party to the appeal.

The record shows that the judgment was rendered on the 5th day of December, 1891, and the transcript, with the assignment of errors-, was filed in this court on the 16th day of July, 1892, on which day a notice for two of the three appellees was issued and served on the 18th day of the month. An entry showing that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smythe v. BoswellIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Hutts v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Lawrence v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Arbuckle v. SwimIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Hawkins v. McDougalIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Kron v. ThelenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. Pankey v. Hot Springs Nat. BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Brady v. GarrisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Barney v. Elkhart County Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Helms v. CookIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API