Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. McDougal

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1890No. 14,871PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Daviess Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— There is no assignment of errors, and hence this court has no jurisdiction of this cause. The assignment of errors constitutes the complaint of the appellant in .all eases appealed from the trial courts, and in the absence of an assignment it is the duty of this court to dismiss the appeal. Estate of Thomas v. Service, 90 Ind. 128; Bacon v. Withrow, 110 Ind. 94; Smythe v. Boswell, 117 Ind. 365, and cales cited p. 366; Lawrence v. Wood, 122 Ind. 452.

Appeal dismissed, at costs of the appellants.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smythe v. BoswellIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Lawrence v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Bacon v. WithrowIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Estate of Thomas v. ServiceIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holloran v. Midland Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Bank of Westfield v. InmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Fitch v. LongIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902