Legal Opinion

Hutts v. Martin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1892No. 16,148PublishedCited by 29 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

This action was instituted by John B. Martin against Mark O. Hutts, Henry P. Hutts, Milton Hutts, Joseph Hutts, Francis Hutts, Eliza Whittaker and William Whittaker. The trial court found that all of the defendants were in possession of the land to which Martin asserted a right, and that they claimed title adversely to him. The court found and adjudged that Martin was entitled to the land, and to recover possession. William Whittaker is not made a party to the appeal, but in the assignment of errors Elizabeth Whittaker is named as an appellant. The *2appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smythe v. BoswellIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Holloran v. Midland Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Hunderlock v. Dundee Mortgage & Trust Investment Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Shulties v. KeiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Concannon v. NobleIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Michigan Mutual Life Insurance v. FrankelIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Zeigler's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  3. Abshire v. WilliamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Tate v. HamlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Commonwealth v. Le GrandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API