Legal Opinion

Pankey v. Hot Springs Nat. Bank

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1938No. 4375PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BICKLEY, Justice.

This case is before us again on appeal after proceedings taken as authorized in the cause reported in 42 N.M. 425, 80 P.2d 765.

It appears that appellant filed his motion appropriate to invoke the discretion reposed in the district court in Sec. 1 of Supreme Court Rule VII, to relieve appellant from the consequences of his failure to serve notice of appeal. Sec. 1 of said Rule VII is as follows: “Within fifteen days after the allowance of an appeal or the issuance of a writ of error, the appellant or plaintiff in error shall give notice thereof to the opposite parties, and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Meldrum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
  2. Oppenheimer v. GuckenheimerSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
  3. Bank of Westfield v. InmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Dailey v. FosterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Succession of BaumgardenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Fairchild v. United Service CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Montgomery v. CookNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Rask v. Board of Bar ExaminersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Urzua v. UrzuaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API