Legal Opinion

Elkem Metals Co. v. Washington County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1998No. 97-1088PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

R.C. 5715.19(A)(2), provides:

“No person, board, or officer shall file a complaint against the valuation or assessment of any parcel that appears on the tax list if it filed a complaint against the valuation or assessment of that parcel for any prior tax year in the same interim period, unless the person, board, or officer alleges that the valuation or assessment should be changed due to one or more of the following circumstances * *
“(a) The property was sold in an arm’s length transaction as described in section 5713.03 of the Revised Code;
“(b) The property lost value due to some casualty;
“(c)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. LombardoSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Seventh Urban, Inc. v. University Circle Property Development, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Stanjim Co. v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Fulton v. State Ex Rel. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Gammarino v. Hamilton County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Groveport Madison Local Schools Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Board of Education v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. L.J. Smith, Inc. v. Harrison Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Diley Ridge Med. Ctr. v. Fairfield Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Ross v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API