Legal Opinion

Gammarino v. Hamilton County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1994No. 1993-2272PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

The decision of the BTA is unreasonable and unlawful and it is reversed.

R.C. 5715.19(A)(2) prohibits a person from filing a complaint as to the valuation of property if the person “filed a complaint against the valuation * * * for any prior tax year in the same interim period, unless the person * * * alleges that the valuation * * * should be changed due to one or more of the following circumstances that occurred after the tax lien date for the tax year for which the prior complaint was filed and that the circumstances were not taken into consideration with respect to the prior complaint:

“(a)…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Snavely v. Erie County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Elkem Metals Co. v. Washington County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Diley Ridge Med. Ctr. v. Fairfield Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. LCL Income Properties v. RhodesOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Kohl's Illinois, Inc. v. Marion Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API