Fulton v. State Ex Rel. General Motors Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
It is the contention of plaintiff in error that under Section 710-98®, General Code, a claim for preference cannot be considered “filed,” until it is physically received by the Superintendent of Banks, or by a special deputy in charge of liquidation of the particular bank, and that since the claim of defendant in error was not received “on or before three months after the last publication of notice,” no duty reposed upon him to consider it.
Defendant in error, however, contends that the requirements of the General Code have been complied with by depositing its claim for preference in the mails…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. LombardoSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- City Street Improvement Co. v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by24 opinions
- Dudukovich v. Lorain Metropolitan Housing AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Welsh Development Co. v. Warren County Regional Planning CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Elkem Metals Co. v. Washington County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- L.J. Smith, Inc. v. Harrison Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- Young v. Bd. of ReviewOhio Court of Appeals · 1967
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.