Legal Opinion
Roberge v. Town of Troy
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 4, 1933PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The action is tort under G. L. 3945 to recover for the alleged neglect of Guy L. Armstrong as constable of the town of Troy to complete the attachment of certain personal property on a writ in favor of the plaintiff against one Isadore Boudro. Trial was by court, and judgment was rendered on the facts found and filed for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted.
It was not error to deny the defendant’s motion for judgment which was made at the close of the evidence, because it was inopportune. The case was one triable by jury, and, therefore, is controlled by G. L. 2259, which provides that when…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Francis v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1927
- Raithel Et Ux. v. HallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
- Powell v. MerrillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
- Walker v. MaxwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1804
- Conn Boston Co. v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Town of Georgia v. Town of WatervilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935
- Levin v. RouilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
- Mott v. BourgeoisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
- Sargent v. Platt and PlattSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
- In Re Environmental Application of Barker Sargent Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.