Legal Opinion

Levin v. Rouille

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 1, 1938PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtles, J.

This action in general assumpsit was brought to recover for professional services as a physician rendered by the plaintiff to the defendant in treating her for injuries received through an accident at her then place of employment. The defendant answered setting up as defenses general denial and infancy. Trial was had by Chittenden municipal court without a jury on May 5, 1937. Thereafter findings by the court were filed and judgment was rendered for the plaintiff to recover the sum of $85.56 and costs. The case comes to this court on defendant’s bill of exceptions.

Defendant has undertaken to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Morgan v. GouldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  2. Raithel Et Ux. v. HallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  3. White River Chair Co. v. Connecticut River Power Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  4. Wlock v. Fort Dummer MillsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  5. Royal Bank of Canada v. GirardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Little v. LoudSupreme Court of Vermont · 1942
  2. Petitions of New England Tel. & Tel. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1951
  3. Barrell v. RenehanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1944
  4. Holton Estate v. EllisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1946
  5. Sparrow v. CimonettiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API