Legal Opinion

Walker v. Maxwell

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 15, 1804PublishedCited by 19 opinions

This was an action of assumpsit, brought before this Court by an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas in this county.

1Opinion of the Court

The action was originally commenced, by the present plaintiffs, together with one James Chace, against the present defendant and one Nathaniel Lyon, upon whom the writ was not served; and the action was prosecuted against Maxwell only. The declaration was as follows, viz., Nathaniel Lyon, card-maker, and Level Maxwell, merchant, both of Warren, in the county of Bristol, and state of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, were attached to answer to Jamas Chace, Barzillai Walker, and Daniel Eddy, all of Somerset, in thi county of Bristol, in the commonwealth of Massachusetts, merchants, late…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Andrews v. HerriotNew York Supreme Court · 1825
  2. Cockrell v. GurleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  3. Werz v. WerzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. Grand Lodge of the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Crouch v. HallIllinois Supreme Court · 1853

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API