Legal Opinion
William Edward Lambert v. Frank S. Thompson, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 7, 1997No. 96-35925Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
113 F.3d 1241
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
William Edward LAMBERT, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Frank S. THOMPSON, Superintendent, Oregon State
Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 96-35925.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 5, 1997.*
Decided May 7, 1997.
Before: SKOPIL, BRUNETTI, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Duncan v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Dwayne Randall JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Carl ZENON, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Marlene Eberle, and Robert Kiser v. City of Anaheim Anaheim Police Department P. Shepard Hagenson MonsoorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Levi Strauss & Co., a Delaware Corporation v. Blue Bell, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.