Marlene Eberle, and Robert Kiser v. City of Anaheim Anaheim Police Department P. Shepard Hagenson Monsoor
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Robert Kiser (“Kiser”) appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of certain officers of the Anaheim City Police Department (“appellees”) in this action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Kiser claims the officers violated his civil rights under the Constitution by arresting him without probable cause and by using excessive force in effecting his arrest. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Kiser, a San Francisco Forty-Niner football fan, attended a football game between the Forty-Niners…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by244 opinions
- Samuel Martinez-Serrano v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Wilson v. Hewlett-Packard Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Joe B. RITCHEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UPJOHN DRUG COMPANY; William Dement, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- State v. Quarterman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- Jennings v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
239 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.