Legal Opinion

Fritchen v. Mueller

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1931No. 29,509PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

This was an action on a promissory note. The defense was a plea of duress. After the cause was tried in full before a jury the court gave an instructed verdict for plaintiff. That ruling is the basis of this appeal.

The facts and circumstances developed by the pleadings and by the evidence favorable to defendants were to this effect:

Prior to October, 1924, the defendant, E. C. Mueller, had served for a number of years as cashier of the Home State Bank of Tipton. Thereafter he obtained employment in a bank in North Kansas City, Mo., and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Beachy v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  2. Williamson v. AckermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  3. Hatch v. BarrettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  4. Wilson v. HaunSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. Hartwell v. Equitable Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1908

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Greep v. BrunsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  2. Grohusky v. Atlas Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  3. Fritchen v. JacobsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. Mountain Electric Company v. SwartzIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Ogle v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API