Legal Opinion

Hatch v. Barrett

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1885PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error from Osage District Court. Action brought December 16,1881, by Philip Barrett and Ducretia Barrett against James Hogden, J. C. Rogers and James Rogers, Charles B. Hatch, and W. E. McCrary, to have a mortgage on certain real estate in Osage county declared void and canceled, for the reason that the same had been procured by duress and gross abuse of the criminal process of the state.

Read the full summary

Error from Osage District Court. Action brought December 16,1881, by Philip Barrett and Ducretia Barrett against James Hogden, J. C. Rogers and James Rogers, Charles B. Hatch, and W. E. McCrary, to have a mortgage on certain real estate in Osage county declared void and canceled, for the reason that the same had been procured by duress and gross abuse of the criminal process of the state. James Hogden, one of the defendants, filed his answer disclaiming any interest in the mortgage, or the pretended debt secured thereby, and the action as to him was dismissed. The other defendants filed their…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

Action upon a note and mortgage. The findings of the trial court are not contested before us, and we must *228therefore accept them in all respects as trae. The immediate circumstances attending the execution of the note and mortgage were as follows: Prior to January 3,1881, Philip Barrett and J. C. Rogers had been interested, as partners, in a lot of cattle ; Rogers claimed that Barrett owed him a greater sum on the sale of the cattle than Barrett admitted. On said January 3d, Rogers employed Alexander Blake, an attorney at law, to obtain a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brown v. PierceSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. United States v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Trust Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Baker v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  5. Watkins v. BairdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Downs v. HortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  2. Markey v. CoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Leavitt v. ThurstonUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Green v. WilkieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  5. Dunham v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API