Legal Opinion

Mountain Electric Company v. Swartz

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1964No. 9396PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

Appellant brought this action seeking to foreclose its second mortgage encumbering real property of respondents, given to secure payment of their promissory note. Repondents denied the indebtedness, and counterclaimed for all sums paid to appellant, claiming that appellant “unjustly and wrongfully received” the same through “coercion and threats and undue influence” of respondents.

Trial by a jury, by assent of appellant and respondents, resulted in a verdict and judgment of $3,880.06 in favor of respondents on their counterclaim. Appellant has appealed from an order denying its…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Walker v. NunnenkampIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Barron v. KoenigIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Thomson v. MarksIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  4. West v. PraterIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Janinda v. LanningIdaho Supreme Court · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Country Cove Development, Inc. v. MayIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Pecos Construction Co. v. Mortgage Investment Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  3. CHESTER B. BROWN COMPANY v. GoffIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Clearwater Construction & Engineering, Inc. v. Wickes Forest IndustriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Shrives v. TalbotIdaho Supreme Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API