Legal Opinion

Fritchen v. Jacobs

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 11, 1933No. 30,996PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This was an action to recover on a note, the defense being that the note was obtained by duress. At the first trial the court gave an instructed verdict in favor of the plaintiff. On appeal that ruling was set aside. (Fritchen v. Mueller, 132 Kan. 491, 297 *323Pac. 409.) In the decision the claims of the adverse parties, as disclosed by the pleadings and the evidence, are reviewed at length and will not be here repeated.

In the last trial, after presentation of the evidence, the cause was submitted to the jury, under instructions, some of which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burns v. SpikerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  2. House v. Wichita Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  3. Bateman v. PreisserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  4. Fritchen v. MuellerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  5. Rockwood v. StubenhofferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bateman v. RollerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  2. Moseman v. L. M. Penwell Undertaking Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  3. Slocum v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  4. Schroeder v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  5. McFadden v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API