Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Haun

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 11, 1916No. 19,961PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 2; Thornton W. Sargent, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

A. B. Wilson brought this action against W. H. Haun and George J. Droll, partners doing business as the Haun-Droll Live Stock Commission Company, to recover the value of his cattle which had been received by the defendants. The cattle were purchased from the plaintiff by W. B. Gillespie, who bought cattle from several parties and shipped them to the defendants, giving to the purchasers drafts from a book furnished him by the defendants. According to the testimony of the plaintiff, at the time the cattle were purchased from the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Banks v. EverestSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  2. Linscott v. ConnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Raynor v. BryantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Greep v. BrunsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  2. Grohusky v. Atlas Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  3. Hurla ex rel. Hurla v. Capper Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  4. Lewis v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. Carver v. Farmers & Bankers Broadcasting Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API