Legal Opinion

Lee v. F. M. Henderson & Associates

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 14, 1973No. 14PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOBBITT, Chief Justice.

Upon appeal, plaintiff assigned as error the following portions of the Commission’s findings of fact: (1) The finding “contained in paragraph No. 2 to the effect that the plaintiff was a' ‘full-time salesman’ at the time of the accident”; (2) the finding “contained in paragraph No. 4 to the effect that the plaintiff had finished his training program prior to the time of the accident”; and (3) the finding “contained in paragraph No. 7 which reads as follows: ‘However, at the time complained of, plaintiff was performing an act personal to himself, constructing a doghouse…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Conrad v. Cook-Lewis Foundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Guest v. Brenner Iron & Metal CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Perry v. American Bakeries CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Robbins v. NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Jones v. Myrtle Desk CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Watkins v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Hoyle v. Isenhour Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Robinson v. JP Stevens and Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Smith v. William Muirhead Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Travelers Insurance v. CurryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API