Lee v. F. M. Henderson & Associates
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BOBBITT, Chief Justice.
Upon appeal, plaintiff assigned as error the following portions of the Commission’s findings of fact: (1) The finding “contained in paragraph No. 2 to the effect that the plaintiff was a' ‘full-time salesman’ at the time of the accident”; (2) the finding “contained in paragraph No. 4 to the effect that the plaintiff had finished his training program prior to the time of the accident”; and (3) the finding “contained in paragraph No. 7 which reads as follows: ‘However, at the time complained of, plaintiff was performing an act personal to himself, constructing a doghouse…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Conrad v. Cook-Lewis Foundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Guest v. Brenner Iron & Metal CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Perry v. American Bakeries CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Robbins v. NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Jones v. Myrtle Desk CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Watkins v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Hoyle v. Isenhour Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Robinson v. JP Stevens and Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Smith v. William Muirhead Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Travelers Insurance v. CurryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.