Smith v. William Muirhead Construction Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
Plaintiff contends that the full commission erred in vacating the opinion and award of the hearing commissioner. Among other things, he argues that the evidence raised the issue of equitable estoppel and that the full commission failed to make findings of fact on the issue. We find merit in the argument.
In reviewing the opinion and award of the hearing commissioner, the commission was authorized by G.S. 97-85 to “reconsider the evidence” and, if proper, to vacate the award. Lee v. Henderson and Associates, 284 N.C. 126, 200 S.E. 2d 32 (1973). The power of the commission to review…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. Northwestern Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Watkins v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Morgan v. Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- Brewer v. POWERS TRUCKING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- McNeely Ex Rel. McNeely v. WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gaines v. L. D. Swain & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Harvey v. Raleigh Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Torain v. Fordham Drug Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Barnes v. O'Berry CenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Graham v. Masonry Reinforcing Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.