Legal Opinion

Kester v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 11, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-9844PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.

This diversity matter comes before the court upon the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Oral argument on this motion was heard by the court on October 27, 1989. For the reasons expressed below, we believe that the defendant’s motion should be granted, subject to the condition stated herein.

Before embarking upon a discussion of the relevant law, it is first necessary to provide a brief chronology of events in the instant case. On or about February 11, 1988, the plaintiff’s dwelling allegedly sustained windstorm damage. At the time of this…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Universal Underwriters of Texas Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Smithson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Meineke v. Twin City Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  4. Hodges v. Pennsylvania Millers Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. 3039 B Street Associates, Inc. v. Lexington InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API