Legal Opinion

Hodges v. Pennsylvania Millers Mutual Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 28, 1996PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, Judge:

Marlene and Kevin Hodges appeal from the Order entered July 13, 1995 dismissing their complaint in this insurance action and ordering the parties to proceed to an appraisal. Since the timeliness of appellee’s appraisal demand is at issue, a chronological review of the facts is necessary.

In August, 1992, the parties executed a homeowners insurance policy. Under section 1, entitled “Conditions,” paragraph 6 of the policy provides:

6. Appraisal. If you and we fail to agree on the amount of loss, either may demand an appraisal of the loss....

Paragraph 8 of the policy provides:

8.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barr v. DeiterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Lefkowitz v. Hummel Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Kester v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Solomon v. United States Healthcare Systems of Pennsylvania, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Siematic Mobelwerke GmbH & Co. KG v. Siematic Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Murray, H. v. Willistown TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Hutchinson v. Pennsylvania State Employes' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Long v. Farmers New Century Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API