State v. Oster
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.
— We are asked to determine the adequacy *143of a “to convict” jury instruction that omits prior convictions which act as an element of the charged crime. The State charged Gregory E. Oster with felony violation of a domestic violence no contact order. A single violation of a domestic violence no contact order (no contact order)1 is a gross misdemeanor, but is elevated to a felony when a jury finds that the defendant has two or more prior convictions for the same crime.2 The “to convict” instruction in this case contained all the elements for a misdemeanor violation of a no contact order, but not…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- State v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. RoswellWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. OsterWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. RoswellWashington Supreme Court · 2008
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.