Legal Opinion

State v. Oster

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 2002No. 71509-2PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.

— We are asked to determine the adequacy *143of a “to convict” jury instruction that omits prior convictions which act as an element of the charged crime. The State charged Gregory E. Oster with felony violation of a domestic violence no contact order. A single violation of a domestic violence no contact order (no contact order)1 is a gross misdemeanor, but is elevated to a felony when a jury finds that the defendant has two or more prior convictions for the same crime.2 The “to convict” instruction in this case contained all the elements for a misdemeanor violation of a no contact order, but not…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. RoswellWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. OsterWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. RoswellWashington Supreme Court · 2008

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API