Legal Opinion

State v. Mills

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 2005No. 73894-7PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*4¶1 In this case, we address whether a single element may be bifurcated from the “to convict” instruction to a special verdict form where such element elevates a base crime from a misdemeanor to a felony. We hold that such bifurcation is constitutionally permissible if the legislature has created a statutory framework that establishes a base crime with elevated penalties if an additional fact is present, and if the additional element is found beyond a reasonable doubt by a unanimous jury. However, in this case we find that the jury instructions did not clearly set forth the requirement that…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. State v. O'HaraWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. FisherWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. FisherWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. MasonWashington Supreme Court · 2007

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API