Legal Opinion

State v. Oster

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 2002No. 71509-2PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

52 P.3d 26 (2002)

147 Wash.2d 141

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Gregory E. OSTER, Petitioner.

No. 71509-2.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued March 19, 2002.

Decided August 15, 2002.

David Donnan, Nancy Collins, Washington Appellate Project, Seattle, for Petitioner.

Norm Maleng, King County Prosecutor, David Seaver, Cynthia Gannett, Ann Summers, Deputies, Seattle, for Respondent.

CHAMBERS, J.

We are asked to determine the adequacy of a "to convict" jury instruction that omits prior convictions which act as an element of the charged crime. The State charged Gregory E. Oster with felony…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. RoswellWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. RoswellWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API