State v. Roswell
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.
¶1 — Washington has enacted certain criminal statutes that raise the level of a crime from a misdemeanor to a felony based upon the defendant’s prior criminal convictions. These prior convictions are elements of the charged crime that the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt. We held in State v. Oster, 147 Wn.2d 141, 147, 52 P.3d 26 (2002), that a trial court did not abuse its discretion in bifurcating the “to convict” instruction with respect to prior criminal offenses in order to protect a defendant from possible prejudice. We are asked to extend our holding in Oster and hold that a…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- State v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- State v. McKagueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.