Legal Opinion

State v. Roswell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 2008No. 80547-4PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChambers, J.

¶1 — Washington has enacted certain criminal statutes that raise the level of a crime from a misdemeanor to a felony based upon the defendant’s prior criminal convictions. These prior convictions are elements of the charged crime that the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt. We held in State v. Oster, 147 Wn.2d 141, 147, 52 P.3d 26 (2002), that a trial court did not abuse its discretion in bifurcating the “to convict” instruction with respect to prior criminal offenses in order to protect a defendant from possible prejudice. We are asked to extend our holding in Oster and hold that a…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  2. State v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  3. State v. McKagueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. State v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. State v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API