Legal Opinion

Investment Technology Group, Inc. v. Liquidnet Holdings, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 21, 2010No. 07 Civ. 510(SAS), 07 Civ. 6886(SAS)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This opinion resolves four motions for summary judgment involving claim one of a method patent 1 owned by Liquidnet Holdings, Inc. (“Liquidnet”). In brief, Liquidnet has alleged that certain electronic methods for integrating buy-side firms’ order management systems with electronic securities marketplaces, developed and marketed by Investment Technology Group (“ITG”) 2 and Pulse Trading, Inc. (“Pulse”), literally infringe claim one of Patent '834, and that ITG willfully infringed the Patent. ITG and Pulse allege that Patent…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. Schriro v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Roe v. City of WaterburyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  4. Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dataquill Ltd. v. High Tech Computer Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2011
  2. Veracode, Inc. v. Appthority, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
  3. Olaf Sööt Design, LLC v. Daktronics, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. Boston Scientific Corp. v. Nevro Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2019
  5. Boston Scientific Corp. v. Nevro Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API