Legal Opinion
Netscape Communications Corp. v. VALUECLICK, INC.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided April 2, 2010No. 1:09cv225PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
T.S. ELLIS, III, District Judge.
In this patent infringement suit, plaintiff claims that defendants 1 wilfully infringed, and continue to infringe, U.S. Patent No. 5,774,670 (“the '670 patent”), colloquially known as the “Internet cookies” patent. Following full briefing and argument, the disputed patent claim terms were construed pursuant to Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 517 U.S. 370, 116 S.Ct. 1384, 134 L.Ed.2d 577 (1996). See Netscape Commc’ns Corp. v. ValueClick, Inc. (Netscape I), 684 F.Supp.2d 678 (E.D.Va.2009) (Mem. Op.). The parties thereafter filed various…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Pacific Insurance Company v. American National Fire Insurance Company, Rail Link, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- American Canoe Ass'n v. Murphy Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Diamond v. DiehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Lynn v. Monarch Recovery Management, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Cohens v. Maryland Department of Human ResourcesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Blanch v. Chubb & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- Evans v. Trinity Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- Touchcom, Inc. v. Bereskin & ParrDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.