Legal Opinion
Paone v. Microsoft Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 30, 2012No. 07-cv-2973 (ADS)(ARL)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
In this patent infringement case, the Plaintiff Luciano F. Paone (“Paone”) alleges that the Defendant Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) has infringed United States Patent 6,259,789 (“the '789 Patent”), which Paone holds. Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decision in Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 517 U.S. 370, 116 S.Ct. 1384, 134 L.Ed.2d 577 (1996), the Court previously construed the disputed claim terms of the '789 Patent. Presently before the Court is the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below,…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ebrahimian v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Intelligent Digital Systems, LLC v. Beazley InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Nassau Precision Casting Co. v. Acushnet Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Suffolk Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Advance Medical Designs, Inc. v. Corbin Clinical Resources, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.