Sterling v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPENCER, P. J.-
Introduction
Defendant (hereafter respondent) Santa Monica Rent Control Board appeals from a judgment granting a peremptory writ of prohibition and prohibiting respondent from: (1) Adjusting maximum rents downward except for the purposes of article XVHI of the city charter, as set forth in section 1800, and the “failure on the part of the landlord to provide adequate housing services,” such as decreases in living space, furniture, furnishings and parking; and (2) “awarding damages in the form of rent withholding to tenants, such authority having been granted expressly to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Carson Mobilehome Park Owners' Ass'n v. City of CarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Cotati Alliance for Better Housing v. City of CotatiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Knight v. HallsthammarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Stearns v. Fair Employment Practice CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- American Indian Model Schools v. Oakland Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- 301 Ocean Avenue Corp. v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Ocean Park Associates v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Richman v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Santa Monica Properties v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.