Legal Opinion
Richman v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 22, 1992No. B058782PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOODS (Fred), J.
Appellant Santa Monica Rent Control Board (Board) appeals from a judgment granting respondent’s petition for a writ of mandate on statutory grounds. The writ ordered the Board to set aside its decision that base rent included parking on two particular rental units owned by respondent. We reverse.
Factual and Procedural Synopsis
I. The Rent Control Law
The Board is a public agency created by the Santa Monica City Charter and vested with authority to administer and enforce article XVIII of that charter (the Rent Control Law). Respondent is an owner of rental property in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carmona v. Division of Industrial SafetyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Sea & Sage Audubon Society, Inc. v. Planning CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- County of Contra Costa v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Killian v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- 301 Ocean Avenue Corp. v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Kennedy v. Beaumont Investment, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Douda v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Village Trailer Park, Inc. v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Sego v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Deol v. Cal. Veterinary Medical Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.