Legal Opinion

Knight v. Hallsthammar

California Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1981No. L.A. 31235PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BIRD, C. J.

This court must decide whether a residential tenant may be held to have impliedly waived a landlord’s breach of implied warranty of habitability by (1) continuing to live in premises despite knowledge of the defects or (2) failing to allow a landlord a reasonable time to repair before withholding rent. There is the additional question as to whether an unlawful detainer action may be defended based on a breach of implied warranty of habitability where defects in the premises predated the current ownership of the building.

I

On May 18, 1977,1 plaintiff landlords became owners of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Park West Management Corp. v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Boston Housing Authority v. HemingwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Becker v. IRM Corp.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Elyse De Stefano v. Apts. Downtown, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  3. Isbell v. Commercial Inv. Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  4. Cunningham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Landeros v. PankeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API